Cases 61 - 70 of 219
Wascher v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2019cv00497
Plaintiff:
Bernard Eugene Wascher, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barrett v. USA
as 6:2019cv00152
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Sly
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail, State of Oklahoma, Jim E Hamilton Correctional Center in Hodgens OK and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Eugene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taron et al v. Alexander et al
as 5:2018cv01198
Defendant:
Auto and Truck Sales Inc and Harold Eugene Alexander
Plaintiff:
Denis Taron and Karen Taron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00627
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Dick Connor Correction Center
Petitioner:
Christopher Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2018cv00776
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Warren Eugene Worman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patton v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Patton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Zelnicek et al v. Shelter General Insurance Company et al
as 5:2018cv00489
Plaintiff:
Eugene Zelnicek, Jr and Debbie Zelnicek
Defendant:
Shelter General Insurance Company and Eischen Insurance Agency Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Padillow v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2018cv00122
Petitioner:
Earnest Eugene Padillow
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The and Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
