Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 114
McLaughlin v. Price et al
as 2:2010cv02249
Plaintiff: Patrick McLaughlin
Defendant: D . Price, . Collinson, . Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Casey et al
as 1:2010cv06951
Plaintiff: Andre Winston
Defendant: Lewis Casey, Hallman Larry, Sander Cornealious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Duncan v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 10-3496
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee: ROGER E. WALKER, JR., GUY PIERCE, GERARDO ACEVEDO and others
James v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2010cv06438
Petitioner: Edward James
Respondent: Gerardo Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jorge Rodriquez, Jr. v. Michael Randle, et al
as 10-3125
Plaintiff - Appellant: JORGE A. RODRIQUEZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL P. RANDLE, Director of the State of Illinois, sued individually and in official capacity, GERARDO ACEVEDO, Warden, sued individually and in official capacity, STEPHEN B. WRIGHT, Assistant Warden, sued individually and in official capacity and others
Jackson v. Mathes et al
as 1:2010cv01280
Plaintiff: Jermaine Jackson
Defendant: Lois Mathes, Gerardo Acevedo, . Magal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorcus Withers v. Wexford Health, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3012
Plaintiff - Appellant: DORCUS WITHERS
Defendant - Appellee: WEXFORD CLEARING SERVICES CORPORATION, LOIS MATHES, DOCTOR SHUTTA and others
Darryl Simms v. Gerardo Acevedo
as 10-2779
Petitioner: DARRYL SIMMS
Respondent: GERARDO ACEVEDO
James Singleton v. Gerardo Acevedo
as 10-2515
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES SINGLETON
Respondent - Appellee: GERARDO ACEVEDO
Shields v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv03746
Plaintiff: Earnest Shields
Defendant: Illinois Department Of Corrections, Gerardo Acevedo, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?