Cases 61 - 70 of 340
Gordon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00097
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain, James D Caldwell and James M. LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Curtis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steelman v. Cain
as 5:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steelman
Defendant:
Burl Cain and James D Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00045
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Jimmie Darnell Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00017
Petitioner:
Freddie J. Banks
Respondent:
Burl N. Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Caldwell
as 3:2015cv00007
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Tramaine Antonio Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Landry v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00005
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Kentrell Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00803
Respondent:
James D Caldwell and Seth Smith
Petitioner:
James Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burgo v. Stansbury et al
as 6:2014cv03452
Plaintiff:
Donald Christopher Burgo
Defendant:
Kim P Stansbury, Sostenes Ruiz, III, Mary Sampey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00790
Respondent:
Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Kelvin Ray Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nalls v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00734
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Petitioner:
Marice S. Nalls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
