Cases 61 - 70 of 192
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edward Terrell v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-16369
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD TERRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD
George Jacobs, IV v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-55992
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE E. JACOBS, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of CDCR, C. M. HARRISON, Warden of CSP - Lancaster, N. GRANNIS, Chief of Inmate Appeals Coordinator and others
Edward Throop v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-80114
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
EDWARD ANTHONY THROOP
Defendant - Respondent:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director CDCR
Thomas Moore v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, Co, et al
as 09-16273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO, CORPORATION, LANE LIMITED, ACCESS SECUREPAK and others
Timothy Ferris v. Jeanne Woodford
as 09-16257
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY JERRY FERRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD
Francisco Beltran v. David Runnels, et al
as 09-55922
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO BELTRAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, Warden and JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of Corrections
Robert Reese, Sr. v. Tom Carey, et al
as 09-16231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT D. REESE, Sr.
Defendant:
TOM L. CAREY, AMIRPOUR VAHDATYAR, JUNG JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
A. TRAQUINA, KOFED and RENEE KANAN
Tossie Bennett v. Thomas Carey, et al
as 09-16204
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOSSIE BENNETT
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS L. CAREY, JEANNE S. WOODFORD and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, Attorney General
Anthony Tarkington v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-16098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LYLE TARKINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, SCOTT KERNAN, J. WALKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
