Cases 61 - 70 of 618
Conrad v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Conrad
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Allen v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Carrie Allen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blackwell v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Clayton Blackwell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
St Charles v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Ronald St Charles
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mobley v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03144
Plaintiff:
Roy Mobley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Galvez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03143
Plaintiff:
Lydia Galvez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martinez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Richard Leroy Martinez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mittie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05837
Plaintiff:
Alisa Mittie
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Frueh v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03135
Plaintiff:
Michael M Frueh
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jimenez v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05130
Plaintiff:
Desiree Jimenez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
