Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Pickering v. Clark et al
as 1:2011cv00937
Plaintiff:
Wayne L. Pickering
Defendant:
Ken Clark, N. Ibanez, A. Enenmoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bilal Ahdom v. Dr. Enenmoh, et al
as 11-15859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILAL AHDOM
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. ENENMOH, Chief Medical Officer, GAIL MARTINEZ, Health Care Manager, J. METTS, Medical Doctor and others
Kenneth Ingraham v. W. Baird, et al
as 11-10934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH LIONEL INGRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
W. DOUGLAS BAIRD, KELLY W. GRAHAM, WILLIAM BURGESS and others
Schafer v. Pierre et al
as 1:2011cv00337
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Schafer
Defendant:
Pierre, R. Gutierrez, F. Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingraham v. Baird et al
as 8:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lionel Ingraham
Defendant:
W. Douglas Baird, Kelly W. Graham, William Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Honesto v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-15072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER J. HONESTO, AKA Pedro Honesto
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, E. BROWN, Jr., J. HARTLEY and others
Honesto v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2010cv05691
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Honesto
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, E. Brown, Jr., J. Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komar et al v. AMEC Constructon Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06720
Defendant:
AMEC Constructon Management, Inc., A Russo Wrecking, ABM Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Komar and Dennis Komar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ahdom v. Enenmoh et al
as 1:2010cv00816
Plaintiff:
Bilal Ahdom
Defendant:
Enenmoh, Gail Martinez, J. Metts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omre v. Dorfman et al
as 1:2010cv01677
Plaintiff:
David Omre
Defendant:
MD Vernon G. Dorfman, MD Steven Komar, MD Shawn M. Field and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
