Cases 61 - 70 of 14,293
Cooley v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-3398
Plaintiff:
NATHAN COOLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ECL NINE LP and LOCKHART GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04478
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mejia-De Fajardo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3364
Petitioner:
HERLINDA DE LOS ANGELES MEJIA-DE FAJARDO, FERNANDA FAJARDO-MEJIA and SOFIA FAJARDO-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Essavi v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-3336
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ESSAVI, Trustee of the Carasso Family Trust
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Clifford C. Loyer v. Los Angeles Superior Court
as 2:2024cv04490
Plaintiff:
Clifford C. Loyer
Defendant:
Los Angeles Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James P. Rodriguez v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept.
as 2:2024cv04492
Plaintiff:
James P. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rod A. Huff Jr, LLC et al v. Beverly Hills Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv04539
Petitioner:
Rod A. Huff Jr, LLC and Rod Anthony Huff, Jr.
Respondent:
Beverly Hills Police Department, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, People of The State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
