Cases 61 - 70 of 6,369
Ralph Moseley v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Ralph Moseley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Steven Michaud v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv04950
Plaintiff:
Steven Michaud
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taj Adaryl Flemmings v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04962
Plaintiff:
Taj Adaryl Flemmings
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Allison Redondo-Lugo v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Allison Redondo-Lugo
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Truong v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Doris Vy Truong
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maylette E. Brown v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Maylette E. Brown
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kamy Hanna v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv04838
Petitioner:
Kamy Hanna and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Rachel Davita Stern v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv04776
Plaintiff:
Rachel Davita Stern
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
