Cases 61 - 70 of 368
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones et al v. Midland Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
John P. Jones and Facynthni Z. Hunter
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage Corporation, MidFirst Bank, Government National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Matthews v. Beneficial Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Otha Matthews
Defendant:
Beneficial Inc., Law Firm of McCalla Raymer and HSBC Bank
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cornelius v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv04394
Plaintiff:
Jameel A. Cornelius
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., US Bank National Association and McCalla Raymer Pierce LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Miles v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv04356
Plaintiff:
Luz Miles
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Spooner et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv03754
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Spooner and Melissa Spooner
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and McCalla Raymer Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Deverze v. McCalla Raymer, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02399
Plaintiff:
Jean A. Deverze
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer, LLC and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROSS v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 5:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE ROSS
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, MCGUIRE WOODS, MCCALLA RAYMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
