Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Ramirez v. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01390
Petitioner: Ricardo Gil Ramirez
Respondent: Mike Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Martel et al
as 2:2010cv01235
Plaintiff: Robert Lopez
Defendant: Mike Martel, Marc Kaplan and Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John William Clancy v. Mike Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv00637
Petitioner: John William Clancy
Respondent: Mike Martel
Eddie Morgan v. Mike Martel
as 10-15766
Petitioner - Appellant: EDDIE DEAN MORGAN
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE MARTELS, Warden
Luis M. Carmona v. Mike Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01942
Petitioner: Luis M. Carmona
Respondent: Mike Martel
Daniel Dixon v. USDCSAC
as 10-70711
: In re: DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Petitioner: DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Respondent: USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: J. S. O'CONNOR, ALTHEA COSTALES, APRIL L. ANDERSON and others
Hiscox v. Martel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00467
Plaintiff: Michael Robert Hiscox
Defendant: Mike Martel, J. Armstrong, K. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent v. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00270
Petitioner: Ronald Kent
Respondent: Mike Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foss v. Martell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03551
Petitioner: Raymond Christian Foss
Respondent: Mike Martell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alcala v. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03407
Petitioner: Joseph G Alcala
Respondent: Mike Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?