Cases 61 - 70 of 3,709
DOLLISON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86297
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JUANITA DOLLISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FENNEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86301
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, CRANE COMPANY, JOHN CRANE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS JOSEPH FENNEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. ACANDS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv82917
Plaintiff:
TONY R. SMITH and DIANE S. SMITH
Defendant:
ACANDS, INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANNON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86395
Defendant:
3M, ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., VIACOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHIQUITA CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMANO v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68773
Plaintiff:
MARY K. ROMANO
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC , CAREY CANADA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICE et al v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68775
Defendant:
AC&S INC , CAREY CANADA , CELOTEX CORP and others
Plaintiff:
WILLADENE RICE and WILLIAM RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLENN v. A C & S INC
as 2:2010cv68776
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GLENN
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC , CAREY CANADA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KNOX et al v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68774
Plaintiff:
DARREL G. KNOX and MONA J. KNOX
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC , CAREY CANADA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86382
Defendant:
D.B. RILEY, INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MESHONA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARE et al v. ACANDS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93212
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC., NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, PROKO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY M. BARE and JOHNNY B. BARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
