Cases 61 - 70 of 226
Terhune v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30140
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Terhune
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sosa v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv11701
Plaintiff:
Juan Sosa
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sosa v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv11701
Plaintiff:
Juan Sosa
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Prescott v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv11699
Plaintiff:
Allison Prescott
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robles Soto v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30134
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Robles Soto
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Vasquez v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv40132
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Menorca A. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gurgone v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv40133
Plaintiff:
Kristal A. Gurgone
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ayotte v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv11623
Plaintiff:
Delia M. Ayotte
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Myers v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30122
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Robert Myers
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sharp v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30124
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ann Sharp
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
