Cases 61 - 70 of 700
Nichols v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Clay County)
as 3:2023cv00756
Petitioner:
Marion Keith Nichols
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NICHOLS v. INTERNATIONAL CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv22353
Plaintiff:
JENNIFFER NICHOLS
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL CLAIMS ADJUSTERS, INC. and NANDOR PETLYSANSZKI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NICHOLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15901
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NICHOLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kalnay v. Pickens
as 3:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Albert Kalnay
Defendant:
Bill Pickens, Paige Cognetti, Christian Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GANTT v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
JAMAEKA NICHOLLE GANTT
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373 Appeal of Decision - DOI
Nichols v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP,
as 1:2023cv21872
Plaintiff:
Bernard Nichols
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Nichols v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Catherine Nichols
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
mediator Gil Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
