Cases 61 - 70 of 132
FOXTON v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv03819
Petitioner:
RICHARD FOXTON
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYANT v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2018cv02701
Petitioner:
JERMAINE L. BRYANT
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. NOGAN
as 2:2018cv02445
Petitioner:
ROBERT V MILLER
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv01251
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Petitioner:
CAMILE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUCCHERI v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2017cv13373
Petitioner:
LEONARDO BUCCHERI
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv12069
Petitioner:
FRANCIS MITCHELL
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CROSS v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2017cv10430
Petitioner:
BRIAN CROSS
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANIGO v. NOGAN
as 2:2017cv06207
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MANIGO
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYD v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2017cv06098
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BOYD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, GARY M. LANIGAN, GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KINNEY v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2017cv05608
Petitioner:
ISAIAH KINNEY
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
