Cases 61 - 67 of 67
CARPINELLI v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01954
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CARPINELLI
Defendant:
LANNETT COMPANY, INC., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PIPE TRADES SERVICES MN v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01534
Defendant:
LANNETT COMPANY, INC., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TWIN CITIES PIPE TRADES WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NECA-IBEW WELFARE TRUST FUND v. ALLERGAN PLC et al
as 2:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
NECA-IBEW WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
ALLERGAN PLC, LANNETT COMPANY, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 30 BENEFITS FUND v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00990
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 30 BENEFITS FUND
Defendant:
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. , IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., WEST-WARD PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN v. ACTAVIS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN
Defendant:
APOTEX CORP. , DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD., FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIANT EAGLE, INC. v. SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00605
Plaintiff:
GIANT EAGLE, INC.
Defendant:
SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ABBOTT PRODUCTS, INC., ABBVIE PRODUCTS, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Walgreen Co. et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01240
Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co., Safeway Inc., American Sales Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
