Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Powers v. Hankins et al
as 4:2016cv04132
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Joe P Hankins, Paula Lodge, Gregg Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Department of Human Services for the State of Illinois et al
as 4:2016cv04098
Plaintiff:
Willie Henderson
Defendant:
Department of Human Services for the State of Illinois, Secretary of the Department of Human Services, James T Dimas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackel v. Dimas et al
as 4:2016cv04073
Plaintiff:
David Mackel
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregory M Bassi, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. Jumper et al
as 4:2016cv04052
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Horne
Defendant:
Shane Jumper, G Carreon, J Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Steffans et al
as 4:2016cv04037
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Defendant:
Lisa Steffans, Amy Louck, B Wear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lodge et al
as 4:2016cv04030
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, Amber Jelinek and Holly Smuzynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shanklin v. Liberty Health Care Corp et al
as 4:2016cv04010
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bernard Shanklin
Defendant:
Liberty Health Care Corp, Department of Human Services, Anderson Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabb v. Dimis et al
as 4:2016cv04005
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
James T Dimis, Herbert Caskey, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childress v. Hankins et al
as 4:2015cv04110
Plaintiff:
Craig A Childress
Defendant:
Joseph Hankins, Wanda Pennock, Keith Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego et al v Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04097
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego, Dothan Rogers, Jeffrey Alan Hargett and others
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg A. Scott, Michael Bednarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
