Cases 61 - 70 of 1,283
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROBIN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02393
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MARK ROBIN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN and RENA BITTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CASTILLO DE MARTINEZ et al v. TIER-ONE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02339
Plaintiff:
BLANCA CASTILLO DE MARTINEZ, VILMA SOMOZA DE CIENFUEGOS, RICHARD CIENFUEGOS and others
Defendant:
TIER-ONE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, JAMES HAROLD HATCHETT III and CLAUDIA EGUEZ-BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
NASH v. ORFINGER et al
as 1:2023cv02264
Plaintiff:
LINDA A. NASH
Defendant:
RICHARD B. ORFINGER, WENDY W. BERGER, JAMES A. EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
REYNA v. CBS NEWS et al
as 1:2023cv02169
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. REYNA, SR.
Defendant:
CBS NEWS, NEW YORK, WASHINGTON, DC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
