Cases 61 - 70 of 109
CARN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40279
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. CARN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ROMERO v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72427
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. ROMERO
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70930
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. JACKSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOODY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71942
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. MOODY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PELAEZ et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38103
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. PELAEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SCHEMM v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38474
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. SCHEMM
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BARRON et al
as 2:2010cv69218
Plaintiff:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
FREDERICK M. BARRON , BARRON AND BUDD , RONALD L. MOTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. POWELL et al
as 2:2010cv00693
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICHARD H. POWELL, III and RACHEL M. POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ADREAN et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv67752
Plaintiff:
JUANITA RUTH ADREAN, MILLIE JANE ADREAN , WILLIAM D ADREAN and others
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGNEW v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv61647
Plaintiff:
RICHARD H. FISHER and KAY FISHER
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., DANA CORPORATION, DB RILEY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
