Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Christopher T. Jackson v. C. M. Harrison et al
as 2:2008cv08112
Defendant:
R. Ayers, Mark C Dozier, C. M. Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hitek Software LLC v. United Surgical Partners International, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06832
Defendant:
P. L. Block, J. A. Brooks, B. R. Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Hitek Software LLC
Antoinette Lewis et al v. Liberty Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2010cv05544
Defendant:
Does and Liberty Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
S. L. and Antoinette Lewis
Ronald F Snyder v. S&L Specialty Contracting Inc et al
as 2:2010cv04892
Defendant:
Does and S&L Specialty Contracting Inc
Plaintiff:
Ronald F Snyder
S.L.T. v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv07663
Plaintiff:
S. L. T.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Cohea v. Pliler, et al
as 2:2000cv02799
Plaintiff:
Danny J. Cohea
Defendant:
J Colvin , D McCargar , S L Scarsella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Baughman, et al
as 2:2001cv00412
Plaintiff:
Willie Carl Lyons, -
Defendant:
D. Baughman , S L Hubbard , T. L. Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Southerhill et al
as 2:2009cv02316
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Defendant:
S. L. Southerhill, D. Pearson, H. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S L Home Fashions, Inc. v. Golden Linen, Inc.
as 2:2008cv07865
Plaintiff:
S L Home Fashions, Inc.
Defendant:
Golden Linen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Alexander v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02773
Plaintiff:
James Alexander
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Arnold Schwarzenegger, T. Felker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
