Cases 61 - 70 of 74
ARCHBOLD v. ADVANCED FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 2:2011cv03131
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
ADVANCED FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION, JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARCHBOLD v. BRUNSWICK BANCORP et al
as 3:2011cv02587
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD , DONALD L. MARVIN and DONALD W. MARVIN
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK BANCORP , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef
Archbold v. Executive Credit Bureau, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00808
Plaintiff:
Sarah Archbold
Defendant:
Executive Credit Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ARCHBOLD v. EXXON MOBILE CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01044
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
EXXON MOBILE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
ARCHBOLD v. INVESTORS SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2011cv01039
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
INVESTORS SAVINGS BANK , JOHN DOES 1-X and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARCHBOLD v. SPENCER SAVINGS BANK et al
as 2:2011cv00412
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
SPENCER SAVINGS BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARCHBOLD v. BRUNSWICK BANCORP et al
as 2:2011cv00366
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK BANCORP , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
ARCHBOLD v. PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARCHBOLD v. GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC.
as 2:2010cv07515
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ARCHBOLD v. VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP et al
as 2:2010cv06796
Plaintiff:
SARAH ARCHBOLD
Defendant:
VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP , VALLEY NATIONAL BANK , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
