Cases 61 - 70 of 255
St. Pierre et al v. St. Pierre et al
as 1:2020cv00165
Defendant:
Sr. Douglas St. Pierre and Jr. Douglas St. Pierre
Plaintiff:
Sr. James Maddocks, Toni Rogers and Randall St. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. USA
as 1:2019cv03392
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Padilla, Sr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sebastian, Jr. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv03109
Plaintiff:
John Mark Sebastian, Sr. and John Mark Sebastian, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hedge Corporation et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2019cv02823
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Howell, Sr. and Hedge Corporation
Defendant:
Robert L. Taylor and Darcee Fox
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Pittman v. Holcomb et al
as 1:2019cv02641
Defendant:
Vansickle and T. Holcomb
Plaintiff:
Darnell Pittman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey et al v. Estate of Jeff Makepeace, The et al
as 1:2019cv02599
Defendant:
Jeff Makepeace, Estate of Jeff Makepeace, The and Jeff (I) Makepeace
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Hickey, Jr., Charles L. Hickey, Sr, Susan Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover Sr. v. Matevousian
as 1:2019cv02385
Plaintiff:
Larry Hoover and Larry Hoover Sr.
Defendant:
Amy Kelly, Andre Matevousian and Catherine Spitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Matevousian
as 1:2019cv02221
Petitioner:
Darnell Love Pittman, Sr.
Respondent:
Andre Matevousian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Blount, Sr. v. Younger et al
as 1:2019cv02134
Defendant:
Jeremiah Younger and Curtis Murphy
Plaintiff:
Donell J. Blount, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
