Cases 61 - 70 of 181
Weaver v. Menard et al
as 1:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Weaver
Defendant:
Rebekah Haggard, Keith Yordy, Steven Menard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Mario Gomez
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, Migliori and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyani, Inc. v. Stevens et al
as 4:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kyani, Inc.
Defendant:
Brandon Stevens , Judy Cao , TF Legacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
China Petrochemical Development v. Praxair Inc
as 1:2018mc10040
Plaintiff:
China Petrochemical Development
Defendant:
Praxair Inc
Movant:
Graham Stevens and Praxair Inc
Verity Property Management, Inc. et al v. The Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 1:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Verity Property Management, Inc. , J. Steven Fender and Lynn Fender
Defendant:
John/Jane Does I-X and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kubat v. Paige
as 1:2018cv00029
Petitioner:
Corey Steven Kubat
Respondent:
Chad Paige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Estate of Steven R. Pitts et al v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Estate of Steven R. Pitts and Stephanie C Pitts
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bonilla v. Alameda County Superior Court et al
as 1:2017cv00528
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
Alameda County Superior Court and Alameda County District Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carty v. Branch et al
as 4:2017cv00439
Petitioner:
Starling Carty
Respondent:
Steven Branch, Thomas Homan, Elaine Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
