Cases
Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Thomas & Thomas Rodmakers Inc et al v. Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland
as 1:2007cv00561
Plaintiff: Thomas & Thomas Rodmakers Inc, Lon W Deckard and L&L3, LLC
Defendant: Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LaSalle Bank National Association v. Thomas et al
as 4:2007cv01215
Plaintiff: LaSalle Bank National Association
Defendant: Thomas Thomas and Trumbull County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00183
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sherrill et al v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2005cv06537
Plaintiff: Margarita Sherrill, Tony Falso, Jon Stewart and others
Defendant: Sutherland Global Services, Inc. and The Sutherland Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Thomas Thomas v. American Standard, et al.
as VAE/2:04-CV-07709
Defendant: American Standard
Plaintiff: Thomas Thomas
Vargo, et al v. Mangus, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2001cv00001
Plaintiff: David Vargo and Lori Vargo
Defendant: Sharon Mangus and Swift Transportation Corporation
Third_party_plaintiff: Sharon Mangus and Swift Transportation Corporation
Counterclaim_plaintiff: Thomas Thomas Morrell d/b/a Morell's Auto Service and Morell's Auto Service
Counterclaim_defendant: Sharon Mangus , Swift Transportation Corporation , David Vargo and others
Miscellaneous_party: Peachtree Settlement Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?