Cases 61 - 70 of 301
Palmer v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00198
Petitioner:
Rodney James Palmer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nadal et al v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christian Nadal and Robbie Bascue
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leifson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sabra Leifson
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Montgomery v. Glacial Technical Solutions et al
as 2:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Michelle Montgomery
Defendant:
Glacial Technical Solutions, Bristol Bay Native Corporation, Woodbury Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and Gerald Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
United States of America v. Roger Scott McQuarrie 101 Trust et al
as 2:2017cv00861
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Roger Scott McQuarrie 101 Trust, BTS Investments, Utah Pacific Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Isomeric Pharmacy Solutions et al
as 2:2017cv00852
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isomeric Pharmacy Solutions, William O. Richardson, Rachael S. Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 331
United States of America v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00756
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry R. Jensen , Pamela J. Jensen , Hawk Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Lee
as 2:2017cv00757
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Daren R. Lee
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
