Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Missing Link Jewelers, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03539
Plaintiff:
Missing Link Jewelers, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Patel v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2008cv00500
Plaintiff:
Nirav C. Patel
Defendant:
Richard W. Mitchell and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Korer v. Danita Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv02837
Plaintiff:
Howard Korer
Defendant:
Danita Corporation and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 1:2008cv02842
Plaintiff:
Charles Martin
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., et al, United Parcel Service, Inc., et al and United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Andreu v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2007cv06132
Plaintiff:
Jose Andreu
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Klymco v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2007cv04714
Plaintiff:
Joseph Klymco, Joseph Klymco, Joseph Klymco and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jackson v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 3:2007cv00450
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jackson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Casey-Beich v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01058
Plaintiff:
Micheal Louanna Casey-Beich
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
