Cases 61 - 70 of 214
McCoy v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
LaKeith LeRoy McCoy
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Kim Holland, J Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas Lee Gleason Jr. v. L. Franklin et al
as 2:2015cv08380
Defendant:
Captain M. A. Buechter, J. Curiel, J. Curiel and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Gleason, Jr.
Gregory Norwood v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-17059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, Director of Prisons, KENNETH CLARK, Warden, K. ALLISON, Warden and others
Antonio Valentino v. W. Sullivan, et al
as 14-56522
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONIO VALENTINO
Respondent - Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-56258
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin, et al
as 14-55820
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD FRANKLIN, Prison Guard Sergeant, individually, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), PAGAN, C. SPENCER and others
Washington v. Sullivan
as 2:2014cv00835
Petitioner:
Kyle Hyatt Washington
Respondent:
W. J. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LaKeith Leroy McCoy v. J. Curiel et al
as 2:2014cv00517
Defendant:
J. Curiel and W. J. Sullivan
Plaintiff:
LaKeith Leroy McCoy
Thomas Lee Gleason Jr. v. L. Franklin et al
as 2:2013cv07015
Defendant:
M. A. Buechter, M. A. Buechter, L. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Gleason, Jr
Gregory Norwood v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-15970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY LYNN NORWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, Director of Prisons, KENNETH CLARK, Warden, K. ALLISON, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
