Cases 61 - 70 of 88
Cope v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv01314
Plaintiff:
James Claude Cope
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014mc22286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014bk00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Hayakawa v. Nakash
as 1:2014cv21533
Plaintiff:
Miwa Hayakawa
Defendant:
Ralph Nakash
Mediator:
Carol S. Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cope v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2014cv14114
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cope
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barthe et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80238
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Edwidge Barthe , Karen A Mancini , Robert Vincent Dubey and others
Defendant:
Kabaka McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Russell et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv60507
Plaintiff:
Richard Russell and Joanne Russell
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Sonic Momentum B, LP v. Motorcars of Distinction, Inc. et al
as 9:2011cv80591
Defendant:
Motorcars of Distinction, Inc., Motorcars of Distinction Maintenance, Inc., Piero Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
Sonic Momentum B, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
