Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Verbridge v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.
as 6:2013cv06140
Plaintiff:
William Verbridge
Defendant:
Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Camelio v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
as 6:2013cv06034
Plaintiff:
Christopher Camelio
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, International Brotherhood of Teamsters-Local Union No. 118 and Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Verbridge v. The Town of Gates et al
as 6:2013cv06018
Plaintiff:
William G. Verbridge
Defendant:
The Town of Gates, The Town of Gates Police Department, Joshua Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McNally v. Wegmans Food Markets Inc.
as 6:2010cv06033
Plaintiff:
Adam M. McNally
Defendant:
Wegmans Food Markets Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
