Cases 61 - 70 of 1,865
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Harbus v. IDA Publishing Co., Inc.
as 3:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
Richard Harbus
Defendant:
IDA Publishing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Kelley v. ExecuNet, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01361
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelley
Defendant:
ExecuNet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kostroun v. RotoUnderworld, LLC
as 3:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
William Kostroun
Defendant:
RotoUnderworld, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 and Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Vidyashev v. TicketNews, LLC
as 3:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Igor Vidyashev
Defendant:
TicketNews, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Assa Abloy AB et al v. CPC Patent Technologies Pty. Ltd. et al
as 3:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Assa Abloy AB, Assa Abloy Inc., Assa Abloy Residential Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
CPC Patent Technologies Pty. Ltd. and Charter Pacific Corporation Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Clarion Events, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Clarion Events, Inc. doing business as Fire Engineering
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
