Cases 61 - 70 of 18,923
GOODEN v. ROYCE et al
as 1:2024cv05440
Petitioner:
MAURICE GOODEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GEE v. COUNTY OF MERCER
as 3:2024cv05319
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GEE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BADU v. LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS et al
as 2:2024cv02418
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BADU
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF MONTELL FIGGINS, DOUGLASS MITCHELL and ASHLEE CHAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
ROMAN v. QUINLAN et al
as 1:2024cv05267
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A. ROMAN
Defendant:
J. QUINLAN, HICKOCK, S. PRINCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
as 1:2024cv05232
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYGA v. PURCIELLO et al
as 2:2024cv04943
Plaintiff:
MIKE LYGA
Defendant:
STEVEN PURCIELLO and THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RECANATI v. BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv05131
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ANTHONY RECANATI
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF BERGEN, MICHAEL ALBANESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIZK v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv05575
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
