Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00808
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00797
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JENKINS v. RHODE ISLAND STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00795
Plaintiff: GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant: RHODE ISLAND STATE, UPS STORE #7051, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Argueta Anariba v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff: Angel Argueta Anariba
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FNU Daley, FNU Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
SWANSON v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SWANSON
Defendant: DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?