Cases 61 - 70 of 7,454
Prather v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Iesha Prather
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Board of Trustees of the NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan v. Standard Electric Service, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Plan
Defendant:
Standard Electric Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
JACKSON v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
LYDELL JACKSON
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MORGAN v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
REGINA A. MORGAN
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
VALE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
KAREN K VALE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Walker v. Hyundai Transys Georgia Seating System, LLC
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Marquez Walker
Defendant:
Hyundai Transys Georgia Seating System, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Denbo v. Prime Rangers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christian Denbo
Defendant:
Prime Rangers, Inc. and Rinnel Williams
WARREN v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
MANIKA WARREN
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Elliott v. Bison Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliott
Defendant:
Bison Plumbing, Inc., Bison Plumbing Services, Inc., Michael Tadlock and others
Powell et al v. Prescott et al
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Carole Powell, Melissa Hogans and Karim Salem
Defendant:
Christopher Prescott and Jason Prescott
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
