Cases 71 - 80 of 7,812
Matthew Jones v. Ohio State Highway Patrol, et al
as 24-3213
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, CVG AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CINCINNATI, OH HIGHWAY PATROL POST 31
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Chelesy Eastep v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 24-5341
Plaintiff:
CHELESY EASTEP, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Landon Dwayne Eastep
Defendant:
CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, REGGIE EDGE, JR., in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol and CHARLES ACHINGER, in his individual and official capacity as an officer of the Tennessee Highway Patrol
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ralph Smith v. David Silvernail, et al
as 24-3187
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BLAINE SMITH and RALPH BLAINE SMITH
Defendant:
DAVID SILVERNAIL, in his personal and official capacities, CITY OF PICKERINGTON, OH, FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OH and others
Dyllan Rives, et al v. University of Tennessee, et al
as 24-5336
Plaintiff:
DYLLAN RIVES and JAMES R. RIVES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, DONDE PLOWMAN, Individually and as Chancellor, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE and others
Kim Hodges v. Joseph Abram, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
KIM HODGES, personal representative for the estate of Michael Donte Molson
Defendant:
JOSEPH ABRAM, BRAXTON CROWDER, Deputy, JASON KELLEY, Lieutenant and others
Donald Parsons v. USA, et al
as 24-3297
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. PARSONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Ryan Slowik, et al v. Keith Lambert
as 24-5132
Plaintiff:
RYAN SLOWIK, VALERIE SLOWIK, A. S., Minor and others
Defendant:
KEITH LAMBERT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
