Cases 71 - 80 of 14,930
Rasmusen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05238
Plaintiff:
Ashley Rasmusen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Tara Ann Maples
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Maples v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Tara Maples
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Phillips v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05235
Plaintiff:
Jamie L Phillips
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Casebolt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05233
Plaintiff:
Brandon Stanley Casebolt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cochell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cochell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grasser v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J. Grasser
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Sharp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05231
Plaintiff:
Tamara Sharp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Shepard v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Denny Shepard
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cruz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Cruz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
