Cases 71 - 80 of 278
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 1:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Claimant:
BENELIUS PAIGE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Claimant:
DARWIN JARMILLO
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE, VEHICLE(S) and All Defendants
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY and VEHICLE(S)
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Claimant:
SARA BOYD
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GUN(S) et al
as 5:2012cv00514
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GUN(S)
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 5:2012cv00485
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 5:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 5:2012cv00414
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 5:2012cv00381
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Claimant:
KIERA NICOLE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
