Cases 71 - 80 of 175
Quick Bridge Funding, LLC v. Ja-Rem Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 8:2018cv01177
Defendant:
Forest Drive Physicians, P.C., Karen Richardson, Dawn Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Quick Bridge Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Misael Romero v. Eung Keun Lim et al
as 5:2018cv01292
Defendant:
Does, Eliza Jin Lim, Eung Keun Lim and others
Plaintiff:
Misael Romero
Abante Rooter and Plumbing Inc. v. Quick Capital Funding LLC et al
as 4:2018cv03126
Plaintiff:
Abante Rooter and Plumbing Inc.
Defendant:
Quick Capital Funding LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Quick Bridge Funding, LLC v. Double Rafter H Construction Company, L.L.C.et al
as 8:2018cv00776
Defendant:
Double Rafter H Construction Company, L.L.C. and Traeger Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Quick Bridge Funding, LLC
Consuelo Campos v. Quick Travel Staffing, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03406
Plaintiff:
Consuelo Campos
Defendant:
Does, Belinda Pagliaro, Quick Travel Staffing, Inc. and others
Fisher et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03073
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS, MICHAEL WOOTEN, IRLINE QUICK and others
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, PFIZER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Quick v. The County of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2018cv00379
Defendant:
Does, Robert Guillen, Dave Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Quick
Timothy Quick v. The County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2018cv00105
Defendant:
Does, Robert Guillen, Dave Phelps and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Quick
Daniel Grant Quick v. Scott Kernan
as 2:2017cv05553
Respondent:
Scott Kernan
Petitioner:
Daniel Grant Quick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
