Cases 71 - 80 of 948
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
DIPIETRO v. BLACK et al
as 4:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DIPIETRO
Defendant:
Warden REGAN BLACK, DR RICHARD ROBINSON, HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2022cv04990
Plaintiff:
Kent Tyrik Robinson
Defendant:
Cobb County, Sheriff Craig Owens, Colonel Westenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTTON v. POLITE et al
as 5:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
MARCUS EUGENE SUTTON
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSEPH POLITE, DEPUTY WARDEN JOE WILLIAMS, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Savannah River Logistics
as 4:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Aundre Robinson
Defendant:
Savannah River Logistics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HFB Properties LLC v. Robinson
as 1:2022cv04798
Plaintiff:
HFB Properties LLC
Defendant:
Wendell Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith et al v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv04807
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Officer Jones, Officer Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTES-ROBINSON v. WIZA
as 5:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
YAHAAKOB ESTES-ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
T&S HARDWOODS INC v. ROBINSON
as 5:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
T&S Hardwoods, Inc. and T&S HARDWOODS INC
Defendant:
William Garner Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv04588
Plaintiff:
Marissa Quintrice Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
