Cases 71 - 80 of 346
MCMILLAN v. PEPPERIDGE FARM, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
COLEMAN MCMILLAN
Defendant:
PEPPERIDGE FARM, INCORPORATED, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MASSENBERG-MEDINA v. HICKS et al
as 2:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
CHANITA MASSENBERG-MEDINA
Cross Claimant:
WALTER HICKS and A&S SERVICES GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5, CELADON TRUCKING SERVICES, INC. and ABC CORPORATIONS 2-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PLOTKIN et al v. WALMART
as 1:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
DIANE PLOTKIN and RICHARD PLOTKIN
Defendant:
WALMART and ABC CORPORATION #1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
OLIVEIRA v. COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE et al
as 2:2021cv20275
Plaintiff:
ADRIANA OLIVEIRA
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSE, JANE DOE DRIVER, JOHN DOE, 1-5, NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv19948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOTURLA v. RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 3:2021cv19917
Plaintiff:
David Boturla
Defendant:
RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., WOODBRIDGE CENTER, BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
