Cases 71 - 80 of 131
Lovell et al v. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
as 1:2021cv21724
Plaintiff:
Clayton Lovell, Jr., Andrew Lovell, Sarah Lovell and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Giant Eagle Markets, Inc., BJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCausland v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 8:2021cv01036
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kristy McCausland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brownlee v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 0:2021cv60921
Plaintiff:
OCTAVIA BROWNLEE
Defendant:
DWAYNE THOMAS, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and MARK HITCHENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
J.R. VIDEOS INTERNATIONAL, INC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2021cv21586
Plaintiff:
J.R. VIDEOS INTERNATIONAL, INC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Thomas et al v. Amazon.Com Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00442
Defendant:
Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.com LLC and Amazon.Com Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shonnika Spears, Andrea Thomas and Deandre Tinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00803
Defendant:
Milum, Inc., Amazon.Com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CARNEGIE v. AMAZON.COM, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00058
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
IRIS CARNEGIE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gardner v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 1:2021cv20878
Defendant:
Amazon.com, United Health (OptumRX), CVS and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 9:2021cv80484
Defendant:
Amazon.com, United Health (OptumRX), CVS and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marquez v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 9:2021cv80392
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeff Barr, Andrez Marquez, Morgan Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
