Cases 71 - 80 of 86
NIMRUL v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
as 2:2010cv05586
Plaintiff:
DEVESH M NIMRUL
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
GLASS v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC. et al
as 2:2010cv05259
Plaintiff:
DEENIE GLASS
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al v. ONYX ENTERPRISES INT'L CORP. et al
as 3:2010cv04016
Plaintiff:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
Defendant:
ONYX ENTERPRISES INT'L CORP., ROMAN GERASHENKO and STANISLAV ROYZENSHTEYN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
ANTI-PINCH SOLUTIONS, LLC v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
as 2:2010cv03352
Plaintiff:
ANTI-PINCH SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ALBAN v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
as 2:2009cv05398
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ALBAN
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SERVICE REMINDER LLC v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
as 2:2009cv03749
Plaintiff:
SERVICE REMINDER LLC
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al v. US FIDELIS, INC.
as 2:2009cv03607
Plaintiff:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
Defendant:
US FIDELIS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
MARCUS v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv05859
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MARCUS
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARECCIO v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv03279
Plaintiff:
DEANA CARECCIO
Defendant:
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
