Cases 71 - 80 of 233
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv23230
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Dyer v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 5:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Neil Dyer
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaffer v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 8:2018cv01382
Plaintiff:
Linda Shaffer
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, Certificateholders of Cwalt, Inc. and Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brock v. Bank of New York, Mellon et al
as 1:2018cv21851
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Brock
Defendant:
Bank of New York, Mellon, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Carlos Curbeto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Patterson v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2018cv20878
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Patterson
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami-Dade Corrections & Rehabilitation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241
Patterson v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2018cv20821
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Patterson
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Miami-Dade Police Department, Miami-Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00080
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Bey v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 9:2017cv81295
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Henry Bey
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Duke Partners II LLC, Sharon Bock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
as 4:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANN JACKSON
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
