Cases 71 - 80 of 688
Burkholder v. Apotex Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv10411
Plaintiff:
Clifford Burkholder
Defendant:
Apotex Corporation, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc., OptumRx, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reid v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Clifford Leon Reid
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MACK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv20101
Plaintiff:
Clifford Pollard Turner
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Clifford P. Turner
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill et al v. Ms. Valdez et al
as 8:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill, Clifford E. Gaynor, Russell E. Lee and others
Defendant:
Ms. Valdez, Warden Roger Hester, Ms. H. Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCFALL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23451
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD MCFALL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLIFFORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20126
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY CLIFFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GABRIEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20055
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD GABRIEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19097
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CLIFFORD GORDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
