Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Time Warner Cable Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Technologies LP
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company L P and others
Movant:
Coxcom Inc., Comcast Cable Communications LLC, Comcast Corporation and others
Counter Claimant:
Time Warner Cable Inc., Rembrandt Technologies LP, Time Warner Entertainment Advance/Newhouse Partnership and others
Counter Defendant:
Rembrandt Technologies LP, Time Warner Cable Inc., Rembrandt Technologies LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Charter Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00400
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Technologies LP and Rembrandt Technologies LP
Defendant:
Charter Communications Inc., Charter Communications Operating LLC, Coxcom Inc. and others
Movant:
Coxcom Inc., Comcast Cable Communications LLC, Comcast Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Rembrandt Technologies LP v. Time Warner Cable Inc.
as 1:2007cv00402
Plaintiff:
Rembrandt Technologies LP
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable Inc.
Movant:
Coxcom Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02299
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
CoxCom Inc, CoxCom Inc, CoxCom Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00214
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157 Motion to Withdraw Reference
FREEDOM WIRELESS V BOSTON COMM
as 06-1020
Defendant-Appellant:
AT&T WIRELESS PCS, BOSTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC, COXCOM, INC. and others
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC., FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC. and FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC.
FREEDOM WIRELESS, INC:
, , and others
Movant-Appellant:
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., NEXTEL OPERATIONS, INC. (now known as Sprint Nextel Corporation), NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
ROGERS WIRELESS, INC. (a/k/a Rogers AT&T Wireless), ROGERS WIRELESS, INC. (a/k/a Rogers AT&T Wireless) and ROGERS WIRELESS, INC. (a/k/a Rogers AT&T Wireless)
In re: ACACIA MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
as 5:2005cv01114
Plaintiff:
Acacia Media Technologies Corp.,, Acacia Media Technologies Corp.,, Acacia Media Technologies Corp., and others
Defendant:
Mediacom Communications Corporation, Mediacom Communications Corporation, Mediacom Communications Corporation and others
Consol Defendant:
Armstrong Group, Armstrong Group, Armstrong Group and others
Miscellaneou:
Rainer Schulz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Costa de Oro TV Inc v. FCC, et al
as 01-1153
Petitioner:
Costa de Oro Television, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
CoxCom, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
