Cases 71 - 80 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01028
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reed et al v. Delta Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01053
Plaintiff:
Sharon Reed
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc. and De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Loewy v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03835
Plaintiff:
Anneliese Loewy
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Biedermann et al v. S&S Limousines, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00555
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Biedermann and Eric Biedermann
Defendant:
S&S Limousines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kelly v. Delta Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01451
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Kelly
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc. and Hartsdale Int'l Airport Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
The Continental Insurance Company v. Delta Airlines, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
The Continental Insurance Company
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc. and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Swift et al v. S&S Limousines, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00860
Plaintiff:
Earl Swift and Ann Swift
Defendant:
S&S Limousines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Encalada v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2008cv04468
Plaintiff:
Paulo Encalada
Defendant:
Delta Airlines, Inc. and Delta Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06879
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
