Cases 71 - 80 of 316
Biesemeier v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02792
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Steven Biesemeier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Desire, LLC v. The Cato Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00839
Defendant:
The Cato Corporation and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Desire, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Durant v. Intercom Inc
as 3:2018cv02171
Defendant:
Intercom, Inc., Intercom Inc and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
John Durant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stross v. Greenhouse Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00704
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
Greenhouse Solutions, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Garden World Images Ltd v. Plant Shed, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00687
Defendant:
Plant Shed, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Garden World Images Ltd
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Brawley et al v. Bath & Body Works LLC et al
as 3:2018cv02098
Defendant:
L Brands, Inc., Does 1 through 10, Bath & Body Works, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brawley and Levi Cody Brawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tharp v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02029
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Doug Tharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stross v. Nunnery et al
as 1:2018cv00467
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Fred Nunnery
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Stross v. Jay et al
as 1:2018cv00464
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Lisa Jay
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Stross v. Gailey et al
as 1:2018cv00463
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Tammy Gailey
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
