Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Malik Dill v. Rawlins-Porteous
as 6:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Khijuan Gilbert Malik Dill
Defendant:
Lakeisha Delilah Jale Rawlins-Porteous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601
Lentz v. Cox et al
as 8:2012cv01635
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Lentz
Defendant:
Yolanda A. Cox, William Dill, Paul P. Triolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILL et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
DIANA LYNN DILL and BRIAN J DILL
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION , BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch Banking and Trust Company v. Dill
as 6:2011cv01541
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Defendant:
Steven M. Dill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2011cv00385
Petitioner:
Donald Dills
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steinberg v. 375 Park Ave. LP, et al
as 0:2004cv60899
Plaintiff:
Marty Steinberg
Defendant:
375 Park Ave. LP, Alford, S.A., Alpha Fifth Group and others
Receiver:
Marty Steinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Zembower v. Dill Air Controls Products, LLC
as 0:2009cv60120
Plaintiff:
Jay Zembower
Defendant:
Dill Air Controls Products, LLC and Dill Air Controls Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Keith v. Kreglo et al
as 6:2007cv01781
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Keith
Defendant:
Roberta Kohn Kreglo, Stephen D. Hurm, Andrew L. Fivecoat and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sharrit, et al v. Chateau Communities, et al
as 6:2000cv00341
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Sharrit, Edgar Sharrit and Christine Sharrit
Defendant:
Chateau Communities, Inc., Chateau Communities Limited Partnership, CP Limited Partnership and others
Petitioner:
Frank T. Allen, John W. Dill and Allen & Dill, P.A.
Not Classified By Court:
M. Susan Sacco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
