Cases 71 - 80 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
O'Brien v. Lacey et al
as 1:2013cv09313
Plaintiff:
Romano O'Brien
Defendant:
Lewis Lacey, Anthony Bankhead and Village of Dolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dobbins et al v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2013cv08140
Plaintiff:
Carol Dobbins , Lynntoi Lawson and Duane Muhammad
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Village of Dolton Board of Trustees , Stanley Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaw et al v. Dolton Riverdale School District 148 et al
as 1:2013cv08087
Defendant:
Dolton Riverdale School District 148 and Jayne Purcell
Plaintiff:
Antoine Shaw , Cheryl Shaw and William Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2013cv07914
Plaintiff:
Jerome White
Defendant:
Village of Dolton and Lewis Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burge et al v. Rogers et al
as 1:2013cv06399
Plaintiff:
Ronald Burge, Sr. , Ronald Burge, Jr. , Lewis Lacey and others
Defendant:
Riley Rogers, John Franklin, Sabrina Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Frasure et al
as 1:2013cv05608
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Heard
Defendant:
John Frasure , Brian Caradine , Dolton Police Officer Graham (Badge #6502) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rowell v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2013cv05071
Plaintiff:
Sharrieff Ali Rowell
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Major Coleman and Damon Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
