Cases 71 - 80 of 254
Myers v. Scribner et al
as 3:2009cv01425
Plaintiff:
Venson Lane Myers
Defendant:
L E Scribner, J M Builteman and Charles Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hon Lau v. George Giurbina, et al
as 09-55924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HON CHUNG LAU
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE GIURBINA, Warden and L. E. SCRIBNER, Warden
Franklin v. Scribner et al
as 3:2009cv01067
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Franklin
Defendant:
L E Scribner, M E Bourland, T Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Placencia v. Larry Scribner
as 09-55786
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD DEAN PLACENCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY E. SCRIBNER, Warden, Warden
Tejay Steele v. L. Scribner
as 09-55697
Petitioner - Appellant:
TEJAY STEELE
Respondent - Appellee:
L. E. SCRIBNER, Warden (a) Calipatria State Prison, California Department of Corrections
Roberto Cortez v. C. Noll, et al
as 09-15690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO CORTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
C. NOLL, L. E. SCRIBNER, G. PONDER, Captain and others
Hosea Byrd v. A. Arias, et al
as 09-55522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOSEA BYRD
Defendant - Appellee:
A. ARIAS, Correctional Counselor # 1, J. ANAYA, Correctional Counselor, J. KELLERMAN, Facility Captain and others
Brian Barnett v. Michael Evans, et al
as 09-15634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH BARNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL EVANS, Warden Salinas Valley Prison, N. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals Branch, L. E. SCRIBNER, Warden, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Timothy Mack v. L. E. Scribner, et al
as 09-55505
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EUGENE MACK
Respondent - Appellee:
L E SCRIBNER, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
