Cases 71 - 80 of 163
Davis et al v. City of Mansfield Ohio et al
as 1:2016cv02974
Plaintiff:
Matthew Davis , Thayne Telquist , Joshua Frech and others
Defendant:
City of Mansfield, Ohio and Lori A Cope
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freeman v. Turoczy Bonding Co. et al
as 1:2016cv02891
Plaintiff:
Abiodun Freeman
Defendant:
Turoczy Bonding Co., Eddie Lee Legacy Inc., Cuffs Off Bail Bonds, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Department of Veterans Affair Medical Center et al
as 1:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affair Medical Center, Alice Miller, Steven Emancipator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abrams, et al. v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02342
Plaintiff:
Michael F Abrams, Jordan Freeman, Joe Cornelius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Freeman v. USA
as 1:2016cv00320
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dwayne Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Freeman v. Durrani, M.D. et al
as 1:2016cv00127
Plaintiff:
Julie Freeman
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, M.D. , Center For Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. , Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. U.S. District Court
as 1:2015cv02101
Petitioner:
Joey Lane Freeman
Defendant:
U.S. District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv01033
Plaintiff:
Penny L. Freeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02062
Plaintiff:
Beth Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01383
Plaintiff:
Nancy Freeman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
