Cases 71 - 80 of 1,535
Matthews v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Matthews
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Gary Thomas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hicks v. City of Akron, et al
as 5:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles Hicks and Charles Hicks
Defendant:
City of Akron, Acting Chief Michael Caprez, Officer John Turnure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04462
Plaintiff:
Gary Sharp
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R BARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sharp v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2022oe04462
Plaintiff:
Gary Sharp
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R BARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tipton v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv02255
Plaintiff:
Gary Tipton
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Tim McConnahay, Julie Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ruff v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04227
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Ruff
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tipton v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
Gary Tipton
Defendant:
Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Tim McConnahay, Julie Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hitchcock v. Brody et al
as 1:2022cv02100
Counter Defendant:
Christopher P. Hitchcock
Defendant:
Efraim Brody, Gitel Braude, Gary M. Waxman and others
Cross Defendant:
Diane R. Waxman
Cross Claimant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Purnell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04100
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Purnell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
